4.8 Article

Determination Of L-dopa using electropolymerized 3,3′,3,3′′′-tetraaminophthalocyanatonickel (II) film on glassy carbon electrode

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 708-713

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2007.08.005

Keywords

3,3 ',3 '',3 '''-tetraaminophthalocyanatonickel(II); polymerization; L-dopa; ascorbic acid; amperometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electropolymerized film of 3,3',3,3'-tetraaminophthalocyanatonickel(II) (p-Ni(11)TAPc) on glassy carbon (GC) electrode was used for the selective and stable determination of 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-dopa) in acetate buffer (pH 4.0) solution. Bare GC electrode fails to determine the concentration Of L-dopa accurately in acetate buffer solution due to the cyclization reaction of dopaquinone to cyclodopa in solution. On the other hand, p-Ni(11)TAPc electrode successfully determines the concentration Of L-dopa accurately because the cyclization reaction was prevented at this electrode. It was found that the electrochemical reaction Of L-dopa at the modified electrode is faster than that at the bare GC electrode. This was confirmed from the higher heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant (k(0)) of L-dopa at p-Ni(11)TAPc electrode (3.35 x 10(-2) cm s(-1)) when compared to that at the bare GC electrode (5.18 X 10(-3) cm s(-1)). Further, it was found that p-Ni(11)TAPc electrode separates the signals of ascorbic acid (AA) and L-dopa in a mixture with a peak separation of 220 mV. Lowest detection limit of 100 nM was achieved at the modified electrode using amperometric method. Common physiological interferents like uric acid, glucose and urea does not show any interference within the potential window Of L-dopa oxidation. The present electrode system was also successfully applied to estimate the concentration Of L-dopa in the commercially available tablets. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available