4.7 Article

High telomerase activity in neutrophils from unstable coronary plaques

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 25, Pages 2369-2374

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.048

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We evaluated telomerase activity in circulating polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and in PMN isolated from coronary atherosclerotic plaques by a novel approach. Background Delayed apoptosis of PMN have been demonstrated in unstable angina (UA). These cells have a finite lifespan with low telomerase activity, a polymerase that extends telomeres, structures essential for cell aging. Reactivation of telomerase has been associated with resistance to apoptosis. Methods We studied 20 patients with UA and 6 patients with chronic stable angina (SA), undergoing a percutaneous Coronary intervention. Circulating PMN were isolated from venous blood and PMN derived from coronary plaque were isolated from washing medium of angioplasty balloons. Results Telomerase activity was higher in coronary plaque PMN of UA patients than in coronary plaque PMN of SA patients (122.7, range 20.5 to 3,696; and 47.7, range 16 to 212.6, respectively, p = 0.00i) and higher than in peripheral PMN of SA patients (122.7, range 20.5 to 3,696 vs. 59, range 16.5 to 132.5, p = 0.001). We found a statistically significant difference between venous and coronary plaque PMN telomerase activity in UA patients (z = -2.875; p = 0.004). Among UA patients, a shorter time interval from symptom onset to coronary PMN sampling was the only independent predictor of high telomerase activity in coronary plaque PMN (p < 0.001, R-2 = 0.75). Conclusions In UA patients, telomerase activity is high in coronary plaque PMN, while it is low in peripheral PMN. Telomerase reactivation in resident PMN resulting in a prolonged lifespan might play a key role in the early phases of instability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available