4.7 Article

Brief communication: Rituximab in HIV-associated multicentric Castleman disease

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 147, Issue 12, Pages 836-839

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-12-200712180-00003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: HIV-associated multicentric Castleman disease is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder with marked systemic symptoms attributed to cytokine disarray. Many therapeutic approaches in small series of patients have proved largely unsuccessful to date. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and clinicopathologic variables associated with first-line treatment for HIV-associated multicentric Castleman disease with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. Design: Single-group, open-label, phase II trial. Setting: 3 teaching hospitals in England. Patients: Previously untreated patients with histologically proven HIV-associated multicentric Castleman disease. Intervention: 4 infusions of rituximab, 375 mg per m(2) of body surface area, at weekly intervals. Measurements: Response was evaluated clinically and radiologically and by measuring plasma Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus viral load. Results: 21 consecutive patients (18 men) with plasmablastic multicentric Castleman disease were recruited. The median follow-up was 12 months (range, 1 to 49 months). one patient died before completing therapy, 20 achieved remission of symptoms, and 14 (67%) achieved a radiologic response. The overall and disease-free survival rates at 2 years were 95% (95% Cl, 86% to 100%) and 79% (Cl, 49% to 100%), respectively. Plasma acute-phase proteins, immunoglobulins, and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus viral load decreased after rituximab therapy. The main adverse effect was reactivation of Kaposi sarcoma. Limitation: The study had no comparison group. Conclusion: Rituximab may be clinically valuable as initial therapy for HIV-associated multicentric Castleman disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available