4.7 Article

Synaptic strength of individual spines correlates with bound Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent kinase II

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 51, Pages 14007-14011

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3587-07.2007

Keywords

dendritic spine; synaptic plasticity; CaMKII; slice culture; fluorescence microscopy; LTP; long-term potentiation; imaging; uncaging

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS-27337] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both synaptic strength and spine size vary from spine to spine, but are strongly correlated. This gradation is regulated by activity and may underlie information storage. Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) is critically involved in the regulation of synaptic strength and spine size. The high amount of the kinase in the postsynaptic density has suggested that the kinase has a structural role at synapses. We demonstrated previously that the bound amount of CaMKII alpha in spines persistently increases after induction of long-term potentiation, prompting the hypothesis that this amount may correlate with synaptic strength. To test this hypothesis we combined two recently developed methods, two-photon uncaging of glutamate for determining the EPSC of individual spines (uEPSC) and quantitative microscopy for measuring bound CaMKII alpha in the same spines. We found that under basal conditions the relative bound amount of CaMKII alpha varied over a 10-fold range and positively correlated with the uEPSC. Both the bound amount of CaMKII alpha in spines and uEPSC also positively correlated with spine size. Interestingly, the bound CaMKII alpha fraction (bound/total CaMKII alpha in spines) remained remarkably constant across all spines. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that bound CaMKII serves as a structural organizer of postsynaptic molecules and thereby may be involved in maintaining spine size and synaptic strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available