4.7 Article

H3+ in diffuse interstellar clouds:: A tracer for the cosmic-ray ionization rate

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 671, Issue 2, Pages 1736-1747

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/523036

Keywords

astrochemistry; cosmic rays; ISM : clouds; ISM : molecules

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using high-resolution infrared spectroscopy we have surveyed twenty sight lines for H-3(+) absorption. H-3(+) is detected in eight diffuse cloud sight lines with column densities varying from 0.6x10(14) to 3.9 x 10(14) cm(-2). This brings to 14 the total number of diffuse cloud sight lines where H-3(+) has been detected. These detections are mostly along sight lines concentrated in the Galactic plane but are well dispersed in Galactic longitude. The results imply that abundant H-3(+) is common in the diffuse interstellar medium. Because of the simple chemistry associated with H-3(+) production and destruction, these column density measurements can be used in concert with various other data to infer the primary cosmic-ray ionization rate, zeta(p). Values range from 0.5x10(-16) to 3x10(-16) s(-1) with an average of 2x10(-16) s(-1). Where H-3(+) is not detected, the upper limits on the ionization rate are consistent with this range. The average value of zeta(p) is about 1 order of magnitude larger than both the canonical rate and rates previously reported by other groups using measurements of OH and HD. The discrepancy is most likely due to inaccurate measurements of rate constants and the omission of effects which were unknown when those studies were performed. We believe that the observed column density of H-3(+) is the most direct tracer for the cosmic-ray ionization rate due to its simple chemistry. Recent models of diffuse cloud chemistry require cosmic-ray ionization rates on the order of 10(-16) s(-1) to reproduce observed abundances of various atomic and molecular species, in rough accord with our observational findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available