4.5 Article

HRAS-mutated Spitz Tumors A Subtype of Spitz Tumors With Distinct Features

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 1436-1441

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181f0a749

Keywords

Spitz tumor; Spitzoid tumor of unknown malignant potential; STUMP; HRAS; molecular biology

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [KUN 2006-3700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is often very difficult to confidently distinguish benign and malignant Spitz lesions, and a diagnosis of Spitz tumor of unknown malignant potential (STUMP) is rendered. To address this problem, we performed molecular genetic analysis in a large group of Spitz tumors (93 Spitz nevi and 77 STUMPs) and identified a subgroup of 24 lesions harboring a HRAS mutation. This subgroup lay predominantly in the dermis, had a relatively low cellularity, showed desmoplasia (with single cells interspersed between the collagen bundles), and had an infiltrating base. In 7 of these 24 cases (29%) melanoma had been the initial diagnosis, or an important differential diagnostic consideration, mainly based on the presence of multiple or deeply located mitotic figures, especially in adult patients. In our series none of the patients with the HRAS-mutated lesions developed recurrences or metastases (mean and median follow-up: 10.5 y). This was in accordance with the literature: review showed that no HRAS mutations had so far been reported in Spitzoid melanomas. We therefore conclude that HRAS mutation analysis may be a useful diagnostic tool to help differentiate between Spitz nevus and Spitzoid melanoma, thereby reducing the frequency of overdiagnosis of melanoma, and to help predict the biological behavior of a STUMP. Moreover, this might be a first step toward a more reproducible classification of Spitz tumors combining histological and genetic data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available