4.5 Article

Pathologic Patterns and Survival in Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 1765-1770

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181bb2538

Keywords

hypersensitivity pneumonitis; fibrosis; survival; UIP; fibrotic NSIP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of the study was to examine the relationship of pathologic pattern and prognosis in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). We analyzed 24 cases of subacute (cellular, nonfibrotic) and 25 cases of chronic (fibrotic) HP. Nineteen (79%) of the subacute cases showed a pattern of bronchiolocentric interstitial pneumonia and 5 (21%) a pattern mimicking cellular nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). Giant cells or granulomas or Schaumann bodies were present in 19 cases (79%), Eighteen (72%) chronic cases showed a pattern resembling usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), but, in most cases, with more peribronchiolar fibrosis than one would expect in UIP. Three fibrotic cases (12%) had only peribronchiolar fibrosis, whereas 4 (16%) resembled fibrotic NSIP. Giant cells or granulomas or Schaumann bodies were present in 22 (88%) cases. Areas of subacute HP were present in 12 cases with a UIP-like pattern. Only 2 UIP-like Cases could not be morphologically distinguished from idiopathic UIP. The median survival for patients who had no fibrosis was 22.4 years; for patients with a fibrotic NSIP pattern was 2.1 years; and for those with a UIP-like pattern 2.8 years (not statistically different). Patients with a pattern of only peribronchiolar fibrosis had a median survival of 11.3 years. These data confirm that the presence of fibrosis is associated with a generally poor prognosis in patients with HP and suggest that pure peribronchiolar fibrosis may portend a longer survival than does a UIP-like or fibrotic NSIP-like pattern of fibrosis. Most cases of chronic HP have distinctive pathologic features, but a small percentage of cases cannot be pathologically distinguished from UIP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available