4.5 Article

Papillary renal cell carcinoma with low-grade spindle cell foci - A mimic of mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1353-1359

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816a1c34

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma; fluorescence in situ hybridization; mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma; papillary renal cell carcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Solid variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is distinguishable genetically from mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSC) of the kidney by the presence of trisomy for chromosomes 7 and 17; however, at the morphologic and immunohistochemical leves, these neoplasms overlap significantly. The key morphologic feature distinguishing these two is thought to be the low grade of the spindle cell areas of MTSC; spindle cell areas in PRCC generally signify sarcomatoid change and are high grade. We report 5 cases of PRCC with low-grade spindle cell foci, closely mimicking MTSC. All patients were male, and ranged in age from 17 to 68 years. All tumors were predominantly solid, featuring compact areas of low-grade spindle cells lining thin, angulated tubules. Mucinous stroma was not appreciated in any case. All cases were diffusely immunoreactive for cytokeratin 7, and focally CD10 positive. All 5 cases showed trisomy of chromosome 7 and 3 of 5 showed trisomy of chromosome 17 by fluorescence in situ hybridization, supporting classification as PRCC. These cases further reported morphologic overlap between MTSC and PRCC. Before a diagnosis of metastatic MTSC or MTSC with unusual morphology is rendered, the possibility of PRCC with low-grade spindle cell foci should be considered. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis effectively separates these morphologically very similar yet genetically distinctive entities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available