Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 201, Issue 1, Pages 31-39Publisher
EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.040
Keywords
Motor skill acquisition; Motor skill retention; Distributed practice schedules; Practice distribution; Vascular anastomosis; Vascular skills laboratory; Operative competence; Surgical skills laboratory curriculum
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND: Practice influences new skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the impact of practice distribution (weekly vs monthly) on complex motor skill (end-side vascular anastomosis) acquisition and 4-month retention. METHODS: Twenty-four surgical interns were randomly assigned to weekly training for 4 weeks or monthly training for 4 months, with equal total training times Performance was assessed before training, immediately after training, after the completion of distributed training, and 4 months later. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in surgical skill acquisition and retention between the weekly and monthly scheduled groups, as measured by procedural checklist scores, global rating scores of operative performance, final product analysis, and overall performance or assessment of operative competence. CONCLUSIONS: Distributed practice results in improvement and retention of a newly acquired surgical skill independent of weekly or monthly practice schedules. Flexibility in a surgical skills laboratory curriculum is possible without adversely affecting training. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available