4.6 Article

Induction of GABAergic postsynaptic differentiation by α-neurexins

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 4, Pages 2323-2334

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M703957200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH070860-03, R01 MH070860-01A1, R01 MH-070860, R01 MH070860, R01 MH070860-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

beta-Neurexin and neuroligin cell adhesion molecules contribute to synapse development in the brain. The longer beta-neurexins function at both glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synapses in coupling to presynaptic calcium channels. Binding of alpha-neurexins to neuroligins was recently reported, but the role of the alpha-neurexins in synapse development has not been well studied. Here we report that in COS cell neuron coculture assays, all three alpha-neurexins induce clustering of the GABAergic postsynaptic scaffolding protein gephyrin and neuroligin 2 but not of the glutamatergic postsynaptic scaffolding protein PSD-95 or neuroligin 1/ 3/ 4. alpha-Neurexins also induce clustering of the GABAA receptor gamma 2 subunit. This synapse promoting activity of alpha-neurexins is mediated by the sixth LNS (laminin neurexin sex hormone-binding protein) domain and negatively modulated by upstream sequences. Although inserts at splice site 4 (S4) in beta-neurexins promote greater clustering activity for GABA than glutamate proteins in coculture assay, alpha-neurexinspecific sequences confer complete specificity for GABA proteins. We further report a developmental increase in the ratio of -S4 to + S4 forms of neurexins correlating with an increase in glutamate relative to GABA synaptogenesis and activity regulation of splicing at S4. Thus, + S4 beta-neurexins and, even more selectively, alpha-neurexins may be mediators of GABAergic synaptic protein recruitment and stabilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available