4.4 Article

The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued in the US

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 200, Issue 3, Pages 378-385

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.007

Keywords

Bariatric surgery incidence; Complication rates; Epidemiology; Costs

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [PL1 DK081183-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the procedure incidence for bariatric surgery have been derived primarily from surveys of bariatric surgeons or from inpatient data sources. New population-representative databases of outpatient surgery are available that enable accurate estimations of bariatric surgery case volumes. METHODS: The 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey, National Inpatient Sample, and National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery were assessed for bariatric surgery procedures. Data were compared with inpatient data from 1993 to 2007. Procedure costs were estimated. RESULTS: The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued at approximately 113,000 cases per year. Open gastric bypass now constitutes only 3% of all cases but costs $4,800 less than laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic gastric banding is performed in 37% of all bariatric surgery cases and costs the same as laparoscopic gastric bypass to perform. Complication rates have fallen from 10.5% in 1993 to 7.6% of all cases in 2006. Bariatric surgery costs the health economy at least $1.5 billion annually. CONCLUSIONS: Despite predictions of continued growth of bariatric surgery, it appears that the annual incidence for these operations has remained stable since 2003. Most operations are performed laparoscopically, but open gastric bypass is substantially less costly than laparoscopic operations. Despite its simplicity, laparoscopic gastric banding costs the same as gastric bypass. There is no cost savings associated with ambulatory bariatric surgery. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available