4.7 Article

Clinical and neuropathologic features of progressive supranuclear palsy with severe pallido-nigro-luysial degeneration and axonal dystrophy

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 460-472

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm301

Keywords

natural history; neuropathology; pallido-nigro-luysial atrophy; progressive supranuclear palsy; pure akinesia; tau

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01-AG17216] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P50-NS40256] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pallido-nigro-luysial atrophy ( PNLA) is a rare disorder that in many cases has histopathological features similar to progressive supranuclear palsy ( PSP). In a pathological series of over 400 cases of PSP, eight cases were noted to have features similar to those described in PNLA, including severe atrophy and neuronal loss in the globus pallidus, substantia nigra and subthalamic nucleus, in addition to many axonal spheroids in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra. These eight cases of PSP-PNLA were compared to 11 typical PSP cases with quantitative neuropathologic indices and assessment of demographics, clinical features and the timing of clinical features. PSP-PNLA cases were younger, had longer disease duration and more often were not initially diagnosed with PSP; in the end, they did not differ from PSP with respect to any major clinical feature. The clinical course of PSP-PNLA, however, was different, with earlier gait abnormalities and difficulty with handwriting, but later falls, rigidity and dysphagia than PSP. Pathologically, the same types of lesions were detected in both PSP and PSP-PNLA, but there were differences in the distribution and density of tau-pathology, with less tau-pathology in motor cortex, striatum, pontine nuclei and cerebellum in PSP-PNLA. These clinical and pathological findings suggest that PSP-PNLA should be considered a variant of PSP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available