4.5 Article

Medulloblastomas overexpress the p53-inactivating oncogene WIP1/PPM1D

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 245-256

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-007-9470-8

Keywords

medulloblastoma; WIP1; PPM1D; p53; isochromosome 17q; FISH; apoptosis

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA100420, CA100420] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD042977, T32 HD042977] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [K08 NS043517, NS043517] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood. Despite numerous advances, clinical challenges range from recurrent and progressive disease to long-term toxicities in survivors. The lack of more effective, less toxic therapies results from our limited understanding of medulloblastoma growth. Although TP53 is the most commonly altered gene in cancers, it is rarely mutated in medulloblastoma. Accumulating evidence, however, indicates that TP53 pathways are disrupted in medulloblastoma. Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (WIP1 or PPM1D) encodes a negative regulator of p53. WIP1 amplification (17q22-q23) and its overexpression have been reported in diverse cancer types. We examined primary medulloblastoma specimens and cell lines, and detected WIP1 copy gain and amplification prevalent among but not exclusively in the tumors with 17q gain and isochromosome 17q (i17q), which are among the most common cytogenetic lesions in medulloblastoma. WIP1 RNA levels were significantly higher in the tumors with 17q gain or i17q. Immunoblots confirmed significant WIP1 protein in primary tumors, generally higher in those with 17q gain or i17q. Under basal growth conditions and in response to the chemotherapeutic agent, etoposide, WIP1 antagonized p53-mediated apoptosis in medulloblastoma cell lines. These results indicate that medulloblastoma express significant levels of WIP1 that modulate genotoxic responsiveness by negatively regulating p53.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available