4.2 Article

Possible differences between the time courses of presynaptic and postsynaptic GABAB mediated inhibition in the human motor cortex

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 184, Issue 4, Pages 571-577

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1125-7

Keywords

intracortical inhibition; cortical inhibition; GABA receptors; transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor cortex; human

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to non-invasively evaluate human motor cortical inhibitory circuits such as short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). Pharmacological studies suggested that SICI is mediated by GABA(A) receptors while LICI is probably mediated by GABA(B) receptors. A previous study also showed that SICI and LICI are mediated by separate neuronal populations and that LICI inhibits SICI, possibly through presynaptic GABA(B) receptors. The aim of this study was to examine whether the time course of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) inhibition by LICI, likely mediated through postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors, is different from SICI inhibition by LICI, likely mediated through presynaptic GABA(B) receptors. Nine healthy volunteers were studied and MEP were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A triple-stimulus TMS paradigm was used to evaluate the effect of LICI at ISIs of 100 and 150 ms on SICI. LICI at 100 and 150 ms caused a similar degree of MEP inhibition. LICI at 100 ms led to a significant reduction of SICI but LICI at 150 ms had no effect on SICI. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between the LICI mediated inhibition of SICI and ISI (P = 0.0072). These findings suggest that the time courses of presynaptic and postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors mediated inhibition are different in the human motor cortex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available