4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Breast cancer tumor size: correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and pathology measurements

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 196, Issue 6, Pages 844-848

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.028

Keywords

Breast cancer; Breast magnetic resonance imaging; Tumor size; Pathology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: As physicians increasingly use magnetic resonance imaing (MRI) for the evaluation of newly diagnosed breast cancers, a review of the correlation between MRI and pathology tumor size is imperative. METHODS: A retrospective review of 91 breast tumors comparing preoperative MRI tumor size to final pathology tumor size was performed. RESULTS: MRI and pathology tumor size were positively correlated (R = .650). but with an average overestimation by MRI of .63 cm (P < .0001). When stratified by MRI tumor size (<= 2.0 cm and >2.0 cm), a significant difference was found only in tumors greater than 2.0 cm (average overestimation = 1.06 cm; P < .0001). This trend continued for the histological subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). CONCLUSIONS: MRI tumor size correlates with pathology size; however, a significant overestimation exists, particularly for tumors >2.0 cm. Clinicians should therefore use caution in relying on MRI tumor size in determining candidacy for breast conservation therapy (BCT). (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available