4.7 Article

Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases among Escherichia coli isolates collected in a Swedish hospital and its associated health care facilities from 2001 to 2006

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 707-712

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01943-07

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic characteristics and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) among Escherichia coli isolates were investigated at a general hospital and its associated health care facilities in Stockholm, Sweden, during the period from 2001 to 2006. Of 87 consecutive nonduplicate ESBL-positive isolates, 80 isolates encoded CTX-M-type ESBLs, 64 of which were group 1 enzymes. TEM-type and OXA-type beta-lactamases were encoded in 63 and 59% of the ESBL isolates, respectively. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis revealed 40 different pulsotypes, consisting of 11 clones accounting for 66% of all isolates, and 29 unique patterns. Moreover, of the 11 clones, clones 1 and 4 comprised half of the clonally related isolates (28 of 57). Clone 1 was a persistent endemic clone in the area throughout the years, and clone 4 emerged in 2003. However, in recent years, clone I isolates were no longer predominant and were gradually replaced by new emerging strains. Concerning P-lactamase gene profiles in relation to PFGE pulsotypes, clone-related bla profiles were observed in certain clones, while in most cases different bla profiles could be observed in the same clone, and the same bla profile could be present in different clones. The molecular epidemiology of ESBL-positive E. coli in the area shows shifts in predominant strains and increased clonal diversity over time. The study also indicated that both clonal spread of epidemic strains and transfer of transposable genetic elements might contribute to the proliferation of ESBLs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available