4.2 Article

An fMRI study of brain activation in a visual adaptation task: activation limited to sensory guidance

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 184, Issue 4, Pages 561-569

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1124-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous neuroimaging studies yielded different patterns of brain areas activated during sensorimotor adaptation, when sensory conflicts are introduced, e.g. by manipulating visual information. We propose that possible reasons might be the lack to control for adaptation or the change in motor performance. In consequence, it was not possible to distinguish between adaptation-related and error-related brain activations. We have developed a sensorimotor adaptation task which controls for these errors using two types of visual distortion and thus is suited to disambiguate sensorimotor adaptation from the related activation patterns. Twenty healthy subjects were scanned by fMRI during a tracking task, while adapting to a visual distortion, which depended either on hand position or on hand velocity. In either case, adaptation was interleaved with a control condition, designed such that the time-course of tracking errors approximated that under visual distortion. We found that adaptation-related neural activation was limited to the left supramarginal and angular gyrus under the position-dependent distortion, but extended bilaterally in the supramarginal gyrus, as well as in the left middle and right superior frontal gyrus under the velocity-dependent distortion. Our findings confirm that equating the errors under both conditions will yield an anatomically more restricted activation pattern compared with other studies. The additional recruitment in right parietal and bilateral frontal areas under the velocity-dependent distortion might reflect a higher computational demand, or the involvement of different adaptive mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available