Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 880-890Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0363546509359068
Keywords
cartilage repair; histology scoring system; human cartilage biopsies
Categories
Funding
- Tigenix n.v. Belgium
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: A reliable and reproducible method is needed to assess cartilage repair. Purpose: This study was undertaken to test the reproducibility of 2 established histological scoring systems, the Modified O'Driscoll Scale (MODS) and International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) Visual Assessment Scale (ICRS l), and subsequently to develop and evaluate a new grading system for cartilage repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 107 cartilage biopsy specimens were graded using MODS and ICRS I, and the reader variability was measured. The new grading system, ICRS II, was developed and the inter- and intrareader variability determined by 3 independent readers. Collagen type II deposition was assessed immunohistochemically. Results: The MODS and ICRS I demonstrated high interreader variability, with MODS also showing high intrareader variability. A new histological scoring system, ICRS II, was developed comprising 14 criteria to assess parameters related to chondrocyte phenotype and tissue structure. The ICRS II demonstrated lower inter- and intrareader variability compared with MODS or ICRS I. The overall assessment and matrix staining scores had the best correlation coefficients for inter- and intrareader variability (r = .81 and .82, respectively). The extent of collagen type II in cartilage, considered a marker of differentiation toward hyaline cartilage, could represent a measure of good cartilage repair. A correlation coefficient of .56 was obtained between the extent of collagen type II staining and the overall assessment score. Conclusion: The ICRS II represents an improvement over current histological cartilage repair grading systems in terms of reader reproducibility. The clinical relevance and its ability to predict long-term repair durability will be assessed once long-term clinical data become available.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available