4.7 Article

FLT3-ITD cooperates with inv(16) to promote progression to acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 1567-1574

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-030312

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA096798, R01CA96798] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI007051] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [K01 DK067186] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inversion of chromosome 16 in the inv(16)(p13q22) is one of the most frequent cytogenetic abnormalities observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The inv(11 6) fuses the core binding factor (CBF) beta subunit with the coiled-coil rod domain of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC). Expression of CBF beta-SMMHC in mice does not promote AML in the absence of secondary mutations. Patient samples with the inv(16) also possess mutually exclusive activating mutations in either N-RAS, K-RAS, or the receptor tyrosine kinases, c-KIT and FLT3, in almost 70% of cases. To test whether an activating mutation of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) would cooperate with CBF beta-SMMHC to promote AML, we coexpressed both mutations in hematopoietic progenitor cells used to reconstitute lethally irradiated mice. Analysis of transplanted animals showed strong selection for CBF beta-SMMHC-FLT3-ITD-expressing cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Compared with animals transplanted with only CBF beta-SMMHC-expressing cells, FLT3-ITD further restricted early myeloid differentiation and promoted peripheralization of primitive myeloblasts as early as 2.5 weeks after transplantation. FLT3-ITD also accelerated disease progression in all CBF beta-SMMHC/FLT3-ITD-reconstituted animals, which died of a highly aggressive and transplantable AML within 3 to 5 months. These results indicate that FLT3-activating mutations can cooperate with CBF beta-SMMHC in an animal model of inv(16)-associated AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available