4.7 Article

Tolerability and safety of mercaptopurine in azathioprine-intolerant patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 220-227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03570.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Azathioprine intolerance is a common clinical problem, requiring drug withdrawal in up to 30% of patients. The successful use of mercaptopurine is described, but data to support this strategy are needed. Aims To assess the tolerability of mercaptopurine in inflammatory bowel disease patients previously intolerant of azathioprine, and identify predictive factors. Methods Sixty-one azathioprine-intolerant patients (31 males, median age at diagnosis 32 years, 31 with Crohn's disease, 30 with ulcerative colitis) who had been treated with mercaptopurine were identified. Intolerances included nausea and vomiting, flu-like illness, neutropenia, hepatotoxicity and pancreatitis. Results Mercaptopurine was tolerated by 59% (36 of 61) of azathioprine-intolerant patients (median dose 1.0 mg/kg), 61% (17 of 28) in patients with azathioprine-related nausea and vomiting, 61% (11 of 18) with flu-like illness, 33% (three of nine) with hepatotoxicity, 100% (one of one) with neutropenia, 100% (three of three) with rash and 0% (zero of one) with pancreatitis. Mercaptopurine intolerance was frequently for a different adverse event. Those intolerant of mercaptopurine were younger (28.4 years vs. 37.0 years; P = 0.014) and more frequently female (14/30 vs. 2/29, P = 0.027). Mercaptopurine tolerability was not affected by diagnosis, location, behaviour, surgery, smoking, family history or extra-intestinal manifestations. Conclusion Mercaptopurine may be tolerated in up to 60% of azathioprine-intolerant patients, and treatment should be considered, particularly if intolerance was due to nausea, vomiting, flu-like illness or rash.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available