4.5 Article

CHANGES IN ZIRCON CHEMISTRY DURING ARCHEAN UHT METAMORPHISM IN THE NAPIER COMPLEX, ANTARCTICA

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Volume 313, Issue 9, Pages 933-966

Publisher

AMER JOURNAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.2475/09.2013.05

Keywords

Antarctica; geochronology; SIMS; ion imaging; zircon

Funding

  1. European Commission [TAF-952 225406-CP-Infra]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zircons from two paragneisses (from Mount Sones and Dallwitz Nunatak) and one orthogneiss (from Gage Ridge) in the Tula Mountains, Napier Complex (East Antarctica) were analyzed for U-Pb age, oxygen isotopes, REEs and by scanning ion imaging. A large number of zircons from all samples are reversely discordant. Mount Sones zircons show an age range from 3.0 Ga to 2.5 Ga and underwent high-grade metamorphism at both similar to 2.8 Ga and 2.5 Ga. Zircons from Dallwitz Nunatak record detrital ages between 3.5 Ga and 2.5 Ga. Zircons from Gage Ridge record multiple age groups, with concordant data between 3.6 Ga and 3.3 Ga and reversely discordant data that form a discrete similar to 3.8 Ga population. All of the grains show evidence of Pb mobility during metamorphism. Ion imaging of zircons reveals Y and U zonation, characteristic of magmatic zircon, together with a micro-scale patchy distribution of Pb-206 and Pb-207 that does not correspond to either growth zonation or crystal imperfections. Some of these patches yield Pb-207/Pb-206 ages >4 Ga, whereas others yield ages younger than the magmatic crystallization age. Reversely discordant data are the result of ancient Pb mobilization, which is independent of the degree of metamictisation, oxygen isotope and REE content of the zircons. This mobilization can result in spurious ages and was most likely caused by polymetamorphism under anhydrous conditions; that is two high-grade events; one poorly defined at similar to 2.8 Ga and the other ultra-high temperature (UHT) metamorphism at 2.5 Ga.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available