4.6 Article

Detection of the lithium depletion boundary in the young open cluster IC 4665

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 479, Issue 1, Pages 141-U70

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078226

Keywords

open clusters and associations : individual : IC4665; stars : low-mass; brown dwarfs; stars : pre-main-sequence; stars : abundances

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. The so-called lithium depletion boundary (LDB) provides a secure and independent tool for deriving the ages of young open clusters. Aims. In this context, our goal is to determine membership for a sample of 147 photometrically selected candidates of the young open cluster IC4665 and to use confirmed members to establish an age based on the LDB. Methods. Employing the FLAMES multi-object spectrograph on VLT/UT2, we have obtained intermediate-resolution spectra of the cluster candidates. The spectra were used to measure radial velocities and to infer the presence of the Li I 670.8 nm doublet and H alpha emission. Results. We have identified 39 bona fide cluster members based on radial velocity, Ha emission, and Li absorption. The mean radial velocity of IC4665 is found to be V-rad = -15.95 +/- 1.13 km s(-1). Confirmed cluster members display a sharp transition in magnitude between stars with and without lithium, both in the I-m vs. I-m - z and in the K-s vs. I-C-K-s diagrams. From this boundary, we deduce a cluster age of 27.7(-3.5)(+4.2) +/- 1.1 +/- 2 Myr. Conclusions. IC4665 is the fifth cluster for which an LDB age has been determined, and it is the youngest cluster among these five. Thus, the LDB is established from relatively bright stars still in the contracting pre-main sequence phase. The mass of the boundary is M* = 0.24 +/- 0.04 M-circle dot. The LDB age agrees well with the ages derived from isochrone fitting of both low and high mass, turn-off stars, a result similar to what is found in the slightly older NGC 2547.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available