4.5 Article

Risk of neoplastic transformation in asymptomatic radial scar. Analysis of 117 cases

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages 371-377

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9569-9

Keywords

radial scar; complex sclerosing lesion; breast carcinoma; benign lesion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Radial scar (RS) is a benign breast lesion but a variable percentage of cases are associated with atypical epithelial proliferations and cancer. Previous studies have shown that patient age and the size of RS are correlated to a potential neoplastic transformation. Methods We collected 117 asymptomatic patients with suspected RS following a mammogram, histologically confirmed. The clinical, pathological and immunophenotypical analysis is reported. The cases are subdivided into three different groups: (1) RS Pure, without epithelial atypia; (2) RS associated with epithelial atypical hyperplasia; (3) RS with cancer. Results Pure RS was detected in 55 patients (47%); the mean age was 48.1 years and the mean size 0.94 cm. RS associated with atypical epithelial hyperplasia was identified in 25 cases (21%) with a mean age of 53.1 years and a mean size of 0.98 cm. Carcinoma in RS was observed in 37 cases (32%); the mean age was 55.5 years and the mean size was 1.16 cm. The mean age was statistically significant (P = 0.004) in separating RS with cancer from the two other RS groups. The size of RS was not sufficiently statistically significant (P = 0.2) to differentiate the risk. Atypical lesions and cancers showed a morphology and marker of low-grade aggressiveness. Conclusion RS seems to represent a natural model of carcinogenesis starting from a proliferative lesion in patients of less than 50 years of age and developing into an atypical and later into a carcinomatous lesion. The fact that most carcinomas arising in RS are low grade also favors this hypothesis. All RS should be excised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available