4.5 Article

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Prostate Cancer Imaging: Impact of b Values

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 202, Issue 3, Pages W247-W253

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10917

Keywords

apparent diffusion coefficient; b value; Gleason score; monoexponential decay; prostate cancer

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Prostate Cancer Research Program through an Idea Development Award [PC093485]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of b values on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values estimated from 1.5-T diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) of the prostate acquired with an endorectal coil in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue regions of interest (ROIs) and the correlation of ADC values with the tumor Gleason score. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Pretreatment DWI studies were analyzed retrospectively in 51 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with either two (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm(2); n = 26 patients) or five (b = 0, 50, 200, 1500, and 2000 s/mm(2); n = 25 patients) b values. In 45 normal peripheral-zone ROIs and 65 prostate cancer ROIs (14 in the central gland), ADC values were estimated by use of several combinations of two or five b values and a monoexponential model. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to characterize the effectiveness of ADC values in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs, and we calculated Spearman rank-order correlation between ADC values and the Gleason score. RESULTS. ADC values were often significantly different (p < 0.001) when estimated from different combinations of two or five b values. However, except when both b values were less than or equal to 200 mm(2)/s or greater than or equal to 1500 mm(2)/s, the AUC value for distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs was similar (0.88-0.93). The correlation coefficients between ADC values and the Gleason score were between -0.30 and -0.68. CONCLUSION. The choice of b values can significantly affect ADC estimates. ADC values can produce a similar discriminant performance in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs and in correlation with the Gleason score, but an appropriate ADC cutoff value needs to be selected specifically for each b-value combination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available