4.5 Article

FOXP3 expressing CD127lo CD4+ T cells inversely correlate with CD38+CD8+ T cell activation levels in primary HIV-1 infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 254-262

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0507281

Keywords

regulation; immunosuppression; viral; AIDS

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI68498, U01 AI41531] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the course of HIV-1 infection, the status of immune activation has been determined to be a powerful indicator of disease progression. The immune system has adopted self-regulatory mechanisms to counterbalance undesirable immune responses. CD25 + CD4 + T regulatory (Treg) cells that express the transcription regulator, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), play an important role in this immunosuppression. Using a combination of Treg cell discriminatory markers ( FOXP3, CD25, CD127), we predicted that an expansion of Treg cell subsets would negatively correlate with immune activation during the early stages of HIV-1 infection. We report that FOXP3 + CD127lo expressing CD4 + T cells increases in primary HIV-1 infection over time. Furthermore, the FOXP3 + CD127lo CD4 + T cells may, in fact, reduce the levels of T cell activation following primary infection. It is interesting that the positive correlation between FOXP3 + CD127lo CD4 + and CD25 + CD127lo CD4 + T cells noted in HIV-uninfected persons is not only lost but may also be reversed in early, chronic HIV-1 infection. Unlike FOXP3 + CD127lo CD4 +, the level of FOXP3 + CD25 + CD127lo CD4 + T cells did not correlate with T cell activation, suggesting that these cells were not effective in reducing T cell activation. These observations suggest that different Treg populations may have different effects on reducing immune activation in HIV-1 infection and that the FOXP3 + CD127lo CD4 + T cell population may be particularly important in limiting immune activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available