4.5 Article

Evaluation of Perfusion CT in Grading and Prognostication of High-Grade Gliomas at Diagnosis: A Pilot Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 200, Issue 5, Pages W504-W509

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8967

Keywords

cerebral blood volume; high-grade glioma; perfusion CT; permeability surface area product

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. Differentiation of grade 3 astrocytoma from glioblastoma multiforme can be difficult with conventional structural imaging but is important for prognosis. The purpose of this study was to assess perfusion CT in differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and their role in prognosis in the care of patients with HGG. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty patients with previously untreated HGG underwent prospective evaluation with perfusion CT. Permeability surface area product (PS) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were calculated by the deconvolution method and were compared between HGGs with Student two-sample t tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for PS, CBV, and the conjoint factor PS + CBV. Cox regression analysis was used to correlate these parameters with patient survival over a follow-up period. Hazard ratios were calculated, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn. RESULTS. There was a significant difference between grade 3 and grade 4 gliomas for PS (p = 0.022) and PS + CBV (p = 0.019) but not for CBV alone (p = 0.411). Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that PS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.72) and CBV + PS (AUC, 0.73) can be used to differentiate grade 3 from grade 4 gliomas but that CBV alone cannot be so used (AUC, 0.54). There was a significant relation between patient outcome and age (p = 0.034) and CBV + PS (p = 0.048). Patients with HGG and a CBV + PS greater than 9 had a poor outcome (hazard ratio, 6.00). CONCLUSION. PS and CBV + PS can be used to differentiate grade 3 from grade 4 gliomas. The outcome of patients with HGG depends on age and CBV + PS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available