4.5 Editorial Material

Declining Impact Factor of Radiologic Journals: A Matter for Debate

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 201, Issue 3, Pages W391-W393

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10256

Keywords

content factor; Eigenfactor; impact factor; Journal Citation Reports; radiologic journals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. As reported in the 2011 Journal Citation Reports, despite an increase of the impact factor (IF) for 54% of all journals, only 39% of imaging journals experienced an IF increase. Of the 41 imaging journals with an IF of higher than 2.0, only 17 obtained a higher IF value in 2011 than in 2010 and the IF of most key international imaging journals decreased. How to manage and contrast this decline in IF is still a challenge for the radiologic community all over the world. CONCLUSION. Radiologic journals may try to increase their IF by soliciting important articles, such as meta-analyses, cost-effective analyses, and guidelines, that are frequently published in high-IF clinical journals, and encouraging nonradiologists to submit relevant radiologic-related clinical articles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available