Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Interpretation of Positron Emission Mammography and MRI by Experienced Breast Imaging Radiologists: Performance and Observer Reproducibility
Deepa Narayanan et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2011)
Breast Cancer: Comparative Effectiveness of Positron Emission Mammography and MR Imaging in Presurgical Planning for the Ipsilateral Breast
Wendie A. Berg et al.
RADIOLOGY (2011)
Characteristics of Probably Benign Breast MRI Lesions
Peter R. Eby et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2009)
MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component
M. Van Goethem et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2007)
High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (positron emission mammography) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer
Wendie A. Berg et al.
BREAST JOURNAL (2006)
Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.
L Liberman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2006)
Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging
JH Menell et al.
BREAST JOURNAL (2005)
Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI
N Morakkabati-Spitz et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2005)
BI-RADS for sonography: Positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features
AS Hong et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2005)
Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts
WA Berg
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2004)
Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions
X Varas et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2002)
Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography
I Vizcaíno et al.
RADIOLOGY (2001)
Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model
LW Nunes et al.
RADIOLOGY (2001)
Share Paper
