4.8 Review

The moderation by the serotonin transporter gene of environmental adversity in the aetiology of mental illness: review and methodological analysis

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 131-146

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002067

Keywords

gene-environment interaction; depression; substance abuse; serotonin transporter; stressful life events

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0701003] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0701003] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0701003] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene-environmental interaction (G x E) between a common functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) and environmental adversity on the onset of depression in humans has been found in fifteen independent studies. It is supported by evidence from animal experiments, pharmacological challenge and neuroimaging investigations. However, negative findings have been reported in two large samples. We explore reasons for the inconsistencies and suggest means to their resolution. Sample age and gender composition emerge as important factors. While the G x E has been consistently detected in young adult samples, there are contradictory findings in adolescent boys and elderly people. The method of assessment of environmental adversity is also important with detailed interview-based approaches being associated with positive G x E findings. Unresolved issues in the definition of the genotype include the dominance of alleles and influence of other polymorphisms, both in 5-HTT and other genes. Assessment of multiple adverse outcomes, including depression, substance use and self-destructive behaviour is needed to clarify the generalisability of the G x E pathogenic mechanisms. Biological and behavioural intermediate phenotypes are yet to be exploited to understand the mechanisms underlying the G x E.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available