4.5 Article

Accuracy of MRI in Prediction of Pathologic Complete Remission in Breast Cancer After Preoperative Therapy: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 195, Issue 1, Pages 260-268

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3908

Keywords

breast neoplasm; meta-analysis; MRI; pathological complete remission; preoperative therapy

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [J50208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. Prediction of pathologic complete remission in breast cancer after preoperative therapy presents difficulties. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the ability of MRI to predict pathologic complete remission in patients with breast cancer after preoperative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Medical subject heading terms (MRI and Breast Neoplasm) and key words (neoadjuvant or primary systemic or preoperative or pre-surgery) were used for a literature search in the MEDLINE database. A meta-analysis of pooled data from eligible studies was performed to estimate the accuracy of MRI in predicting pathologic complete remission after preoperative therapy in patients with breast cancer. RESULTS. Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.63 (range, 0.56-0.70) and 0.91 (range, 90.89-0.92), respectively. Heterogeneity between studies was highly influenced by the pathologic complete remission rate, with a regression coefficient of -6.160 (p = 0.020). Subgroup analysis showed that the specificity of MRI in studies with a pathologic complete remission rate of >= 20% was lower than that in studies with a pathologic complete remission rate of < 20% (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION. This meta-analysis indicates that MRI has high specificity and relatively lower sensitivity in predicting pathologic complete remission after preoperative therapy in patients with breast cancer. The pathologic complete remission rate may influence the performance of MRI accuracy in this setting, which deserves further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available