Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 194, Issue 2, Pages W134-W140Publisher
AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3116
Keywords
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; liver tumors; lung tumors; reproducibility; solid tumors
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVE. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is a potentially useful non-invasive technique for assessing tissue perfusion, particularly in the context of solid tumors and targeted antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies. Our aim was to determine the reproducibility of perfusion parameters derived at DCE-MRI of tumors of the lung and liver, the most common sites of metastasis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients with lung and liver tumors underwent two sequential DCE-MRI examinations 2-7 days apart without any intervening therapy. The volume transfer constant between blood plasma and the extravascular extracellular space (K-trans) and blood-normalized initial area under the signal intensity-time curve (initial AUC(BN)) were computed with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Differences in parameters were assessed with within-patient coefficients of variation. RESULTS. Twenty-three patients had evaluable tumors (12 lung, 11 liver). The within-patient coefficients of variation for K-trans and initial AUC(BN) for liver lesions were 8.9% and 9.9% and for lung lesions were 17.9% and 18.2%. Sample sizes for reductions in these parameters from 10% to 50% were estimated to range from two to 102 subjects. Estimates of confidence that changes observed in a given patient were due to intervening therapy rather than variability of the technique were calculated to range from 71% to 87% if a 20% reduction in a parameter was observed. CONCLUSION. The rate of reproducibility of DCE-MRI parameters is in the range of 10%-20% and is influenced by lesion location, parameters being significantly more reproducible in the liver than in the lung. These findings provide the foundation for interpretation of results and design of clinical trials in which DCE-MRI studies are used to assess objective responses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available