4.5 Review

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: What Is the Evidence and What Are the Obstacles?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue 1, Pages 55-60

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2553

Keywords

contrast-enhanced ultrasound; contrast media; FDA approval; radiology practice guidelines; ultrasound contrast agents

Funding

  1. Lantheus Medical Imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. Although ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are popular and widely used in Europe and Asia, the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved a microbubble agent for radiology imaging in the United States. Herein, we discuss the evidence for and the obstacles to using UCAs for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CONCLUSION. Despite the obstacles to the use of UCAs for CEUS including regulatory and practice patterns, the evidence indicates that radiologists and patients will be missing an effectual imaging option if we do not encourage the use of CEUS and strongly support the approval of UCAs by the FDA. The evidence outweighs the obstacles: CEUS is cost-effective; can be performed at the bedside; uses no ionizing radiation; has no nephrotoxicity; and, most importantly, can provide accurate diagnostic information comparable to CT and MRI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available