4.5 Article

(1)H MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast: Are They Useful Tools for Characterizing Breast Lesions Before Biopsy?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue 3, Pages 840-849

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2128

Keywords

apparent diffusion coefficient; breast biopsy; breast neoplasms; diffusion-weighted imaging; MRI; proton MR spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine whether proton ((1)H) MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion-weighted imaging might be useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Single-voxel (1)H MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed in 171 suspicious or highly suspicious lesions. Using the residual water signal its a reference (4.7 ppm), a choline peak at 3.22-3.23 ppm was defined as malignant. If a high-signal-intensity lesion was detected in high-b-value (b = 1,500 s/mm(2)) images, that lesion was defined as positive for malignancy. Among the patients with positive results on diffusion-weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the mass of focus were calculated from two different gradient factors (b(1) = 500 s/mm(2) and b(2) = 1,500 s/mm(2)). RESULTS. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of (1)H MRS were 44% (40/91) and 85% (68/80), respectively (p < 0.001). If (1)H MRS was applied for mass lesions larger than 15 mm, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 82% (28/34) and 69% (11/16) respectively. Of the high-b-value images, 24 benign lesions and eight nonmass ductal carcinoma in situ were visually negative. With the use of a cutoff ADC value of 1.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a specificity of 67% (43/64) and sensitivity of 97% (61/63) was obtained on diffusion-weighted imaging. CONCLUSION. (1)H MRS was useful for characterizing breast lesions measuring 15 mm or larger, and diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for characterizing lesions of any size. However. these two techniques still have potential pitfalls in relation to the diagnosis of nonmass breast lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available