4.6 Article

CYP2E1 substrate inhibition - Mechanistic interpretation through an effector site for monocyclic compounds

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 6, Pages 3487-3496

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M707630200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR015569-060011, P20 RR015569] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study we offer a mechanistic interpretation of the previously known but unexplained substrate inhibition observed for CYP2E1. At low substrate concentrations, p-nitrophenol (pNP) was rapidly turned over (47 min(-1)) with relatively low K-m (24 mu M); nevertheless, at concentrations of > 100 mu M, the rate of pNP oxidation gradually decreased as a second molecule bound to CYP2E1 through an effector site (K-ss = 260 mu M), which inhibited activity at the catalytic site. 4-Methylpyrazole (4MP) was a potent inhibitor for both sites through a mixed inhibition mechanism. The K-i for the catalytic site was 2.0 mu M. Although we were unable to discriminate whether an EIS or ESI complex formed, the respective inhibition constants were far lower than K-ss. Bicyclic indazole (IND) inhibited catalysis through a single CYP2E1 site (K-i = 0.12 mu M). Similarly, 4MP and IND yielded type II binding spectra that reflected the association of either two 4MP or one IND molecule(s) to CYP2E1, respectively. Based on computational docking studies with a homology model for CYP2E1, the two sites for monocyclic molecules, pNP and 4MP, exist within a narrow channel connecting the active site to the surface of the enzyme. Because of the presence of the heme iron, one site supports catalysis, whereas the other more distal effector site binds molecules that can influence the binding orientation and egress of molecules for the catalytic site. Although IND did not bind these sites simultaneously, the presence of IND at the catalytic site blocked binding at the effector site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available