4.5 Article

Laser Ablation of Metastatic Lesions of the Lung: Long-Term Outcome

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 192, Issue 3, Pages 785-792

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1425

Keywords

laser ablation; laser-induced thermotherapy; lung; metastasis; thermal ablation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. Pulmonary metastatic lesions are present in 20-54% of all patients who die of cancer. Surgical studies have shown that local management of distant tumor metastasis as part of multimodal cancer therapy improves survival. Minimally invasive procedures such as thermal ablation are still to prove their clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to monitor therapeutic outcome and long-term results after percutaneous laser-induced thermal ablation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixty-four patients with metastasis to the lung underwent laser-induced thermal ablation in an ongoing prospective study. A total of 129 percutaneous procedures were performed to manage a total of 108 lung lesions. The median tumor size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.4-8.5 cm). Adequate management of all known individual tumor correlates was critical for definitive patient therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival and recurrence rates. RESULTS. Definitive management of initial pulmonary disease was achieved in 31 of 64 patients. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates after ablative therapy were 81%, 59%, 44%, 44%, and 27%. The median progression-free interval was 7.4 months. There were no therapy-related deaths. Pneumothorax occurred in 38% of the patients, necessitating periprocedural drainage in 5% of all cases. Parenchymal bleeding (13% of cases) always was self-limited. CONCLUSION. Laser ablative therapy for pulmonary metastasis is a promising option in multimodal cancer therapy. The procedure is safe and effective. The initial clinical outcome data strongly suggest that this technique has the potential to improve survival among selected patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available