4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessing the risk of irrigation bottle and fluid contamination after endoscopic sinus surgery

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 197-199

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3481

Keywords

Chronic sinusitis; cleaning; contamination; endoscopic sinus surgery; irrigation bottle; postoperative care; saline nasal irrigation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Saline nasal irrigation has become an important aspect of post-operative care following endoscopic sinus surgery. The objective of this study was to identify the risks of contamination of both the nasal irrigation bottle and fluid following endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: This was a prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis. All patients were given nasal irrigation bottles with detailed cleaning instructions preoperatively. Nasal irrigation bottles were collected and cultured at I and 2 weeks postoperatively. During the same visit, 5-ml of sterile normal saline was mixed into the irrigation bottle and then cultured separately. Results: A total of 20 patients agreed to participate in the study. At I week postoperatively, 50% of the bottles had positive cultures with 40% of the irrigation samples testing positive for bacteria. At two weeks, the contamination in the irrigation bottle and fluid decreased to 26.7% and 20%, respectively. The most common bacteria cultured was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There were no cases of postoperative infection. Conclusion: Despite detailed cleaning instructions, there is a relatively high risk of bacterial contamination in nasal irrigation bottles and fluid following endoscopic sinus surgery. Although these risks did not translate into higher infection rates post surgery, it may be important for physicians to emphasize regular cleaning techniques to minimize a potential source of bacterial contaminant exposure. (Am J Rhinol Allergy 24, 197-199, 2010; doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3481)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available