4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Manuka honey: Histological effect on respiratory mucosa

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages E63-E66

Publisher

OCEAN SIDE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3453

Keywords

Animal study; biofilm; chronic rhinosinusitis; histology; manuka honey; nasal irrigation; topical treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease in which bacteria are commonly implicated often in the form of a biofilm. Manuka honey has been shown in vitro to be an effective treatment against two common CRS pathogens both in the planktonic and in the biofilm forms. The purpose of this study was to determine if the application of manuka honey to respiratory epithelium would result in histological evidence of epithelial injury. Methods: Using a rabbit animal model, a nonrandomized controlled trial of four treatment regimes was performed with two rabbits in each group. The left nasal cavity was irrigated with a 1.5-mL manuka honey solution once daily and the right nasal cavity was not treated. Groups 1-3 were treated for 3, 7, and 14 consecutive days, respectively, and killed the morning after the last treatment. Group 4 was treated for 14 consecutive days followed by a 14-day washout period and then killed the following morning. The nasal respiratory mucosa was immediately harvested after death. The mucosa was examined by light microscopy for histological change in comparison with the control side. Results: Cilia were not measured quantitatively but were equally present on the treated and untreated mucosa. There was no histological evidence of inflammation, epithelial injury, or significant morphological changes. Conclusion: The application of a manuka honey solution to rabbit nasal respiratory mucosa over different treatment intervals did not show evidence of histological epithelial injury. (Am J Rhinol Allergy 24, e63-e66, 2010; doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3453)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available