4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Factors contributing to failure in endoscopic skull base defect repair

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 185-191

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3293

Keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; CSF leak; endoscopic sinus surgery; intrathecal fluorescein; lumbar drain; neoplasm; skull base; wound healing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endoscopic repair of skull base (SB) defects is successful in over 90% of cases. Certain factors may con tribute to fail tire of SB repair techniques or need for secondary repair. Methods: Five-year retrospective review Of endoscopic SB defect repairs performed by a single surgeon. Results: Eighty-nine patients undergoing 110 procedures to repair 97 SB defects were evaluated. Etiology of defects included surgical/introgenic (64%), spontaneous (17%), traumatic (12%), congenital (6%), and idiopathic (1%). Defects occurred in the sella (41%), sphenoid sinus (18%), ethmoid roof (17%), olfactory cleft (16%),frontal sinus/recess (6%), and middle cranial fossa (2%). Sixty-three patients (71%) underwent primary SB defect repair and 26 patients underwent secondary repair (29%). In revision cases, mean number of prior repair attempts Was 1.5 (range, 1-4). Factors potentially contributing to need for secondary SB defect repair included inability to localize SB defect (p =0.008), development of new SB defect, prior sinus or SB surgery (p < 0.001), prior craniotomy (p < 0.001), prior radiation therapy (p = 0.002), and intracranial infection (p = 0.023). SB defects Were successfully closed in 83 patients overall (93%), with success achieved in 97% of primary patients and 85% of secondary patients. Of failures, 3 patients required craniotomy for defect closure, 2 patients underwent permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, and I patient has persistent CSF rhinorrhea. Conclusion: Although endoscopic repair of SB defect remains largely successful, certain factors should alert the surgeon to the potential for failure of repair or need for secondary SB defect repair.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available