4.7 Article

Multiple genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 313AG, MDR1 3435CC, and MTHFR 677CC highly correlated with early relapse of breast cancer patients in Taiwan

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 872-880

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9719-7

Keywords

breast cancer; early relapse; multiple genetic polymorphisms; GSTP1; MDR1; MTHFR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, receptors, and other drug targets have been linked to inter-individual differences in the efficacy and toxicity of many medications. In the present study, multiple chemotherapeutic agent-related genetic polymorphisms, including GSTP1, MDR1, MTHFR, and TS tandem repeats, were analyzed in breast cancer patients and studied in correlation with the clinical outcome of patients receiving FEC adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The genotypes from 192 stage II and III breast cancer patients who underwent operations and received six cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (FEC) were determined by means of PCR-RFLP. The association of each genetic polymorphism with clinicopathological data of patients and early relapse status were analyzed. Results: The results showed that the genotype distribution of GSTP1 A313G, MTHFR C677T, and TS 3R3R in Taiwanese subjects differed significantly from the distribution in Caucasians. After analysis of the relationship between the genotypes and clinicopathological data of the patients, a significant correlation was observed between postoperative early relapse in patients with genetic polymorphisms of both MDR1 3435CC and MTHFR 677CC (crude OR: 2.609, P = .013) and patients with additional GSTP1 313AG genetic polymorphism (crude OR: 2.833, P = .017). Conclusions: The results of the present study highly suggest that GSTP1, MDR1, and MTHFR genotypes could be prognostic factors for Taiwanese patients with breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available