4.5 Article

Poly (D,L-lactide)/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and biocompatibility evaluation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 1075-1082

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3181-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodegradable polymer/bioceramic composite scaffolds can overcome the limitations of conventional ceramic bone substitutes such as brittleness and difficulty in shaping. However, conventional methods for fabricating polymer/bioceramic composite scaffolds often use organic solvents (e.g., the solvent casting and particulate leaching (SC/PL) method), which might be harmful to cells or tissues. In this study, Poly (D,L-lactide)/nano-hydroxyapatite (PDLLA/NHA) composites were prepared by in-situ polymerization, and highly porous scaffolds were fabricated using a novel method, supercritical CO(2)/salt-leaching method (SC CO(2)/SL). The materials and scaffolds were investigated by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). GPC showed that the molecular weight of composites decreased with increase of NHA content. However, the water absorption and compressive strength increased dramatically. The SEM micrographs showed that the scaffolds with pore size about 250 mu m were obtained by controlling parameters of SC CO(2)/SL. The biocompatibility of PDLLA/NHA porous scaffolds were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The evaluation on the cytotoxicity were carried out by cell relative growth rate (RGR) method and cell direct contact method. The cytotoxicity of these scaffolds was in grade I according to ISO 10993-1. There was no toxicosis and death cases observed in acute systemic toxicity test. And histological observation of the tissue response (1 and 9 weeks after the implantation) showed that there are still some slight inflammation responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available