4.6 Article

CPI-17 Silencing-Reduced Responsiveness in Control and TNF-α-Treated Human Bronchi

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0177RC

Keywords

CPI-17; TNF-alpha; epoxyeicosatrienoic acid; bronchial hyperresponsiveness; human lung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under pathophysiologic conditions, the modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity and reactivity of bronchial smooth muscle is controlled by protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation of the newly described protein, CPI-17. The goal of the present study was to assess the key role of this regulatory protein in airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) using control and TNF-alpha-treated human bronchi as well as a specific siRNA duplex against human CPI-17 transcripts. Validity of a mixed transfection strategy was assessed using the reversible permeabilization method to introduce X-TremeGene (X-TG)-siRNA complexes in an overreactive model of human bronchi treated with TNF. Data demonstrate that X-TG-siRNA complexes targeted against CPI-17 transcripts resulted in a reduction in mRNA and specific protein expression in human bronchial tissues. This approach revealed that overall reactivity of bronchial smooth muscle to methacholine was reduced, while their relaxing responses to beta(2)-agonist were increased, when compared with responses triggered in control TNF-alpha-treated bronchi. Quantification analysis showed that Ca2+ -sensitivity in both untreated and TNF-alpha-treated bronchi were largely reduced upon transfection with human CPI-17 siRNA-XTremeGene complexes, while Western blot analysis corroborated the decrease in CPI-17 and MLC phosphorylation levels in pretreated human bronchi. Identical results were obtained upon treatment with an antfinflammatory eicosanoid, 14,15-EET, known to inhibit CPI-17 phosphorylation. Together these results are consistent with a key molecular role for CPI-17 in AHR, in the absence of bronchial wall remodeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available