4.7 Article

The effect of co-cultivation and selection parameters on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chinese soybean varieties

Journal

PLANT CELL REPORTS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 489-498

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0475-8

Keywords

Agrobacterium tumefaciens; Glycine max; cotyledonary node; transformation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation system was developed for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] based on the examinations of several factors affecting plant transformation efficiency. Increased transformation efficiencies were obtained when the soybean cotyledonary node were inoculated with the Agrobacterium inoculum added with 0.02% (v/v) surfactant (Silwet L-77). The applications of Silwet L-77 (0.02%) during infection and L-cysteine (600 mg l(-1)) during co-cultivation resulted in more significantly improved transformation efficiency than each of the two factors alone. The optimized temperature for infected explant co-cultivation was 22 degrees C. Regenerated transgenic shoots were selected and produced more efficiently with the modified selection scheme (initiation on shoot induction medium without hygromycin for 7 days, with 3 mg l(-1) hygromycin for 10 days, 5 mg l(-1) hygromycin for another 10 days, and elongation on shoot elongation medium with 8 mg l(-1) hygromycin). Using the optimized system, we obtained 145 morphologically normal and fertile independent transgenic plants in five important Chinese soybean varieties. The transformation efficacies ranged from 3.8 to 11.7%. Stable integration, expression and inheritance of the transgenes were confirmed by molecular and genetic analysis. T-1 plants were analyzed and transmission of transgenes to the T-1 generation in a Mendelian fashion was verified. This optimized transformation system should be employed for efficient Agrobacterium-mediated soybean gene transformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available