4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Stack performances in high temperature steam electrolysis and co-electrolysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 40, Issue 35, Pages 11370-11377

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.085

Keywords

Hydrogen and syngas production; High temperature steam electrolysis; Steam and CO2 Co-Electrolysis; Stack; Upscaling

Funding

  1. company McPhy Energy
  2. EIT through the KIC InnoEnergy (MINERVE project) [76_2012_IP35_MINERVE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High Temperature Steam Electrolysis (HTSE), based on solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOE) is a promising way to produce massively hydrogen with high efficiencies. This technology also allows producing syngas (H-2 + CO) by co-electrolyzing a mix of steam and CO2. This syngas constitutes the basis to obtain further synthetic fuels. For both HTSE and co-electrolysis, durability and cost are still key points, but additionally for co-electrolysis the outlet H-2/CO gas composition has to be tailored to fit with the targeted fuels. Previous works have been carried out to develop a stack design suitable for both applications. Here experiments at stack level in both electrolysis and co-electrolysis modes have been carried out. A 10-cell stack and a 25-cell stack have been tested in electrolysis mode, respectively producing 0.6 Nm(3)/h and 1.7 Nm(3)/h of hydrogen at 800 degrees C below the thermoneutral voltage (1.3 V) for all the cells and a steam conversion around 50%, with a small scattering between the different cells. Gas tightness of the stacks has also been evaluated. Moreover, the operation in co-electrolysis has been validated. Finally a cost analysis of this stack design has been performed and shows all the economical potentialities of this technology. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available