4.7 Article

Causes and Circumstances of Death in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1640OC

Keywords

pulmonary hypertension; outcome assessment; cause of death

Funding

  1. CTSA KL2 from National Center for Research Resources, a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RR024990]
  2. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  3. NIH [HL081064, HL107147, HL095181, RR026231]
  4. Ohio Department of Development [BRCP 08-049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: The causes and circumstances surrounding death are understudied in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Objectives: We sought to determine the specific reasons and characteristics surrounding the death of patients with PAH. Methods: All deaths of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) followed in the Cleveland Clinic Pulmonary Vascular Program were prospectively reviewed by the PH team. A total of 84 patients with PAH (age 58 +/- 14 yr; 73% females) who died between June 2008 and May 2012 were included. Measurements and Main Results: PH was determined to be the direct cause of death (right heart failure or sudden death) in 37 (44%) patients; PH contributed to but did not directly cause death in 37 (44%) patients; and the death was not related to PH in the remaining cases (n = 7; 8.3%). In three (3.6%) patients the final cause of death could not be adequately assessed. Most patients died in a healthcare environment and most received PH-specific therapies. In our cohort, 50% of all patients with PAH and 75.7% of those who died of right heart failure received parenteral prostanoid therapy. Less than half of patients had advanced healthcare directives. Conclusions: Most patients with PAH in our cohort died of their disease; however, right ventricular failure or sudden death was the sole cause of death in less than half of patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available