4.7 Article

Severe Asthma Lessons Learned from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research Program

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201107-1317PP

Keywords

asthma; remodeling; inflammation; bronchoscopy; imaging

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL69116, HL69130, HL69155, HL69167, HL69170, HL69174, HL69349, HL091762, M01 RR03186, M01 RR007122-14, 1UL1RR024992, 1UL1RR024989, 1UL1RR025011]
  2. NHLBI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0801056B, G1000758, G1000758B] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10212] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) has characterized over the past 10 years 1,644 patients with asthma, including 583 individuals with severe asthma. SARP collaboration has led to a rapid recruitment of subjects and efficient sharing of samples among participating sites to conduct independent mechanistic investigations of severe asthma. Enrolled SARP subjects underwent detailed clinical, physiologic, genomic, and radiological evaluations. In addition, SARP investigators developed safe procedures for bronchoscopy in participants with asthma, including those with severe disease. SARP studies revealed that severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease with varying molecular, biochemical, and cellular inflammatory features and unique structure-function abnormalities. Priorities for future studies include recruitment of a larger number of subjects with severe asthma, including children, to allow further characterization of anatomic, physiologic, biochemical, and genetic factors related to severe disease in a longitudinal assessment to identify factors that modulate the natural history of severe asthma and provide mechanistic rationale for management strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available