4.8 Article

Genome-wide DNA copy number analysis in pancreatic cancer using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages 1951-1960

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210832

Keywords

pancreatic cancer; tissue microdissection; SNP array; genetic alterations; SKAP2/SCAP2

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [A6253, A6438, A6789] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify genomic abnormalities characteristic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in vivo, a panel of 27 microdissected PDAC specimens were analysed using high-density microarrays representing similar to 116000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci. We detected frequent gains of 1q, 2, 3, 5, 7p, 8q, 11, 14q and 17q (>= 78% of cases), and losses of 1p, 3p, 6, 9p, 13q, 14q, 17p and 18q (>= 44%). Although the results were comparable with those from array CGH, regions of those genetic changes were defined more accurately by SNP arrays. Integrating the Ensembl public data, we have generated 'gene' copy number indices that facilitate the search for novel candidates involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Copy numbers in a subset of the genes were validated using quantitative real-time PCR. The SKAP2/SCAP2 gene (7p15.2), which belongs to the src family kinases, was most frequently (63%) amplified in our sample set and its recurrent overexpression (67%) was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR. Furthermore, fluorescence in situ hybridization and in situ RNA hybridization analyses for this gene have demonstrated a significant correlation between DNA copy number and mRNA expression level in an independent sample set (P < 0.001). These findings indicate that the dysregulation of SKAP2/SCAP2, which is mostly caused by its increased gene copy number, is likely to be associated with the development of PDA C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available