4.7 Article

Forced Vital Capacity in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Test Properties and Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201105-0840OC

Keywords

interstitial lung disease; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; forced vital capacity; minimal clinically important difference; mortality prediction

Funding

  1. InterMune Inc., Brisbane, CA
  2. InterMune, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Forced vital capacity (FVC) is an established measure of pulmonary function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Evidence regarding its measurement properties and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in this population is limited. Objectives: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of FVC and estimate the MCID in patients with IPF. Methods: The study population included all 1,156 randomized patients in two clinical trials of IFN-gamma 1b. FVC and other measures of functional status were measured at screening or baseline and 24-week intervals thereafter. Reliability was assessed based on two proximal measures of FVC, validity was assessed based on correlations between FVC and other measures of functional status, and responsiveness was assessed based on the relationship between 24-week changes in FVC and other measures of functional status. Distribution-based and anchor-based methods were used to estimate the MCID. Measurements and Main Results: Correlation of percent-predicted FVC between measurements(mean interval, 18 d) was high (r = 0.93; P < 0.001). Correlations between FVC and other parameters were generally weak, with the strongest observed correlation between FVC and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (r = 0.38; P < 0.001). Correlations between change in FVC and changes in other parameters were slightly stronger (range, r = 0.16-0.37; P < 0.001). Importantly, 1-year risk of death was more than twofold higher (P, 0.001) in patients with a 24-week decline in FVC between 5% and 10%. The estimated MCID was 2-6%. Conclusions: FVC is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of clinical status in patients with IPF, and a decline of 2-6%, although small, represents a clinically important difference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available