4.6 Article

CpG island methylation profile of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Journal

MODERN PATHOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 238-244

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800991

Keywords

PanIN; pancreatic cancer; methylation specific PCR; DNA methylation

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA062924-140011, P50 CA062924, P50 CA062924-149002, P50 CA062924-159002, P50 CA062924-150011] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is thought to develop through well-defined precursor lesions called pancreatic intraductal neoplasia (PanIN). Despite the exponential growth in our understanding of genetic events that characterize the progression of PanINs to invasive carcinoma, little is known about the role of epigenetic alterations in these precursor lesions. To define the timing and prevalence of methylation abnormalities during early pancreatic carcinogenesis, we investigated the CpG island methylation profile in the various grades of PanINs. Using methylation-specific PCR, we analyzed DNA samples from 65 PanIN lesions for methylation status of eight genes recently identified by microarray approach as aberrantly hypermethylated in invasive pancreatic cancer. Aberrant methylation at any of the eight genes was identified in 68% of all the PanIN lesions examined, and, notably, aberrant methylation was identified in more than 70% of the earliest lesions (PanIN-1A). The average number of methylated loci was 1.1 in PanIN-1A, 0.8 in PanIN-1B, 1.1 in PanIN-2, and 2.9 in PanIN-3 lesions (P = 0.01 for PanIN -3 vs earlier PanINs). Among the genes analyzed, NPTX2 demonstrated an increase in methylation prevalence from PanIN-1 to PanIN-2 (P = 0.0008), and from PanIN-2 to PanIN-3 for SARP2 (P = 0.001), Reprimo (P = 0.01), and LHX1 (P = 0.03). These results suggest that aberrant CpG island hypermethylation begins in early stages of PanINs, and its prevalence progressively increases during neoplastic progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available