4.5 Article

Development of a whole cell green fluorescent sensor for lysine quantification

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 353-359

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-007-9479-3

Keywords

Escherichia coli; lysine bioavailability; biosensor; green fluorescent protein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an essential amino acid, lysine is an important component of animal and human diets and its bioavailability can depend on a variety of factors. Therefore, an accurate pre-determination of bioavailable lysine in foods and feeds is important. In this study a whole cell fluorescent biosensor for the quantification of lysine in protein sources was constructed. A gene encoding for green fluorescent protein (GFPmut3) was introduced into an E. coli lysine auxotroph genome as a part of a mini-Tn5-Km transposon. The location of the transposon was determined and the growth kinetics of the newly constructed biosensor were examined. The transposon disrupted the ybhM gene, which encodes for the synthesis of a protein with an unknown function. No effect of the transposon's location in the genome or the expression of gfp on bacterial growth rates was observed. Based on the fluorescence emitted by GFPmut3, a standard curve after 6-h growth of the strain was generated. A correlation coefficient of 0.95 was observed when the fluorescence method was compared to the conventional optical density (OD) growth-based lysine assay. Using the newly developed lysine fluorescent whole cell sensor we determined the total lysine in casein acid hydrolyzate (7.13 +/- 0.34%). When lysine added to 12 mu g/ml and 30 mu g/ml of casein acid hydrolyzate was quantified, recoveries of 97 +/- 1.65% and 103 +/- 4.66% respectively were detected. The results suggest that the microbial assay using GFP fluorescence represents a promising alternative method for the potential estimation of lysine in protein sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available