4.6 Article

Effect of pressure support ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure on the rapid shallow breathing index in intensive care unit patients

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 505-510

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0939-x

Keywords

mechanical ventilation; rapid shallow breathingindex; pressure support ventilation; positive end-expiratory pressure; intensive care unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We compared rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) values under various ventilatory support settings prior to extubation. Design and setting: Prospective study in the intensive care unit at a university hospital. Patients: Thirty six patients ready for extubation. Interventions: Patients were enrolled when receiving pressure support ventilation (PSV) of 5 cmH(2)O, PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O, and FIO2 of 40% (PS). Subsequently each patient received a trial of PSV of 0 cmH(2)O, PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O, and FIO2 of 40% (CPAP), a trial of PSV of 0 cmH(2)O, PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O and FIO2 of 21% (CPAP-R/A), and a 1-minute spontaneously breathing room air trial off the ventilator (T-piece). Trials were carried out in random order. Measurements and results: Respiratory frequency (f) and tidal volume (V-T) were measured during PS, CPAP, CPAP-R/A, and T-piece in all patients. RSBI (f/V-T) was determined for each patient under all experimental conditions, and the average RSBI was compared duringPS, CPAP, CPAP-R/A, and T-piece. RSBI was significantly smaller during PS (46 +/- 8bpm/l), CPAP (63 +/- 13bpm/l) and CPAP-R/A (67 +/- 14bpm/l) vs. T-piece (100 +/- 23bpm/l). There was no significant difference in RSBI between CPAP and CPAP-R/A. RSBI during CPAP and CPAP-R/A were significantly smaller than RSBI during T-piece. In all patients RSBI values were less than 105 bpm/l during PS, CPAP, and CPAP-R/A. However, during T-piece the RSBI increased to greater than 105 bpm/l in 13 of 36 patients. Conclusions: In the same patient the use of PSV and/or PEEP as low as 5 cmH(2)O can influence the RSBI. In contrast, changes in FIO2 may have no effect on the RSBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available